8.1 Orders of Understanding

From Sense & Sensibility & Science
Revision as of 20:30, 21 February 2024 by Gpe (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Topic Icon - 8.1 Orders of Understanding.png

Often the simplest and crudest explanation is sufficient to understand a phenomenon, without the need to worry about the finer details. For any given phenomenon, we encourage students to consider the most important, first-order, causes, before moving on to far less important, second- and higher-, order causes. This structured scientific way of thinking is crucial for policy making when resources are limited.

The Lesson in Context

This lesson introduces a practical framework for discussing cause and effect in this complex world. Specifically, the students should learn that there are usually multiple causes contributing to a certain effect, and it is possible to compare the magnitude of the effects from different causes. We wish to encourage students to develop the habit of considering multiple possible causes, rather than just claiming that "[math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is the cause of [math]\displaystyle{ Y }[/math]".

Takeaways

After this lesson, students should

  1. Recognize that there are usually multiple causes that contribute to an effect to varying degrees, ranked first-, second-, third-order, and so on.
  2. Recognize that there are often multiple causes of the same order of importance.
  3. Understand that a model is inevitably a simplification of the real world. As one includes finer and finer details, one is taking into account higher and higher order causes.
    1. The order of a cause is determined by the magnitude of its effect, relative to other causes.
    2. When creating a model, there are some factors (causes) for which we don't consider the order, because we assume them to be constant (for example, they are the underlying environment or circumstance). Whether or not we assume something to be constant may be partly a question of values. (For example, when considering a model of traffic accidents, we typically don't include oxygen content in the air, even though if the oxygen suddenly went out, everyone would crash.)

Additional Content

You must be logged in to see this content.